Interview objective: Establish both data-use rights and an operational correction workflow.
Put this to: A catalogue-data provider, the publisher’s content lead and Jan Kovac.
Why it matters to buyers: SlotCatalog’s public v5 document says game attributes—including demo links and RTP values—can change, and includes an affiliate-publication restriction. Its October 2026 website terms place B2B services under separate written agreements. Those documents do not establish whether a particular buyer can negotiate different rights. (slotcatalog.com)
Draft framing — a good answer should cover:
- Permission to display, cache, transform and retain each licensed data category.
- Stable IDs, studio attribution, version identifiers and source timestamps.
- Separate dates for original release, market release and demo availability where supplied.
- How corrections, withdrawals and uncertain values are represented.
- Whether changes overwrite editorial decisions or enter an approval queue.
- What data and assets may remain after termination.
Sharp follow-up: “Show a correction moving from the source record to a published review, including who approves it and how the old claim is identified.”
Buyer output: A metadata schema with provenance, permitted uses, update handling and editorial ownership.
A secondary job-board listing for a casino content specialist describes provider liaison, metadata maintenance and catalogue audits. Use that only as a prompt about operational responsibilities—not as evidence of demo-publisher staffing levels or market demand. (remoterocketship.com)
Expert quote — awaiting interview: [Approved quotation and attribution.]