DEMO SUPPLY / THE PUBLISHER’S RESEARCH DESKPERMISSION · COVERAGE · DELIVERY
Demo SupplySourcing research for US-facing publishers
Scope a shortlist

03 Section 03 of 12 / Understand the market

Comparisons

Compare the rights, responsibilities and true operating cost of each sourcing route.

14Research pages
60Sources cited
28 Oct 2026Last updated
An ordered archive of navy and violet game catalogue cards

Decision explorer

Which sourcing model fits?

Analytical fit guidance from the research. A route does not establish supplier permission.

Read the full comparison

In this section

01

What is the best way to source demo slot content?

Start with publisher-specific access and direct studio permissions, then pay for aggregation only where it demonstrably improves your authorised coverage or operating costs.

Read →
02

What did this research verify—and what did it not?

This is a public-source comparison of supplier offerings, published terms, integration documentation, browser behaviour and selected US regulatory guidance.

Read →
03

How do the main sourcing routes compare?

Compare the rights package, delivery service and editorial usefulness separately.

Read →
04

Which named suppliers have relevant public evidence?

The strongest public evidence is a specific publisher product or permission pathway—not merely a prominent studio name.

Read →
05

What should count as sufficient demo-slot authorisation?

Require evidence tied to the proposed use, rather than a generic statement that the supplier is licensed.

Read →
06

How do free authorised demos compare with paid aggregation?

Free access is a real option, but its operational cost must be measured.

Read →
07

How should buyers compare catalogue breadth and freshness?

Build the editorial requirement first, then ask which supplier can satisfy it.

Read →
08

Is a demo-slot API better than an iframe?

This is usually the wrong comparison: an API can supply catalogue records or launch URLs while an iframe displays the game.

Read →
09

What should a fair supplier pilot measure?

Test the same buyer-priority titles and visitor conditions wherever the suppliers overlap, then test each supplier’s unique coverage separately.

Read →
10

How do US territory, promotion and privacy checks differ?

Keep three approvals separate: permission, observed availability and legal suitability.

Read →
11

How should buyers score the alternatives?

Apply pass/fail gates before weighted scoring.

Read →
12

How should a publisher compare continuity and exit options?

Evaluate dependency independence, not the number of supplier logos.

Read →
13

What should the buyer send suppliers next?

Send one consistent sourcing brief, then ask for evidence—not a larger presentation.

Read →

Desk self-assessment / out of 10

9Buyer fit
9Depth
9Search relevance
8Sources